checkyourfund.eu Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the checkyourfund.eu

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host checkyourfund.eu. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is GoDaddy.com LLC .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called ATS/7.1.2 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

tel: 00 32 (0)2 514 37 77 | [email protected] check your fund a better finance website toggle navigation home categories media coverage about inquiries fund filter guidelines check your fund a better finance website toggle navigation home categories media coverage about inquiries fund filter guidelines check your fund a better finance website fund filter disclaimer the study carried out by better finance is only replicating the european regulator's (esma) 2015 study, using the same sources and referencing the same period: from 2010 to 2014 only. it is a one shot study limited in time. data results generated from esma's methodology and filtering criteria therefore may very well have changed since then. this website and study does not contain a complete list of equity funds sold in the eu but only the "ucits" equity funds selected following esma's criteria. better finance has not identified any closet index fund. it has only recreated and published the list of funds that esma sampled earlier, including those esma identified itself as “potential equity closet indexing funds”, based on its sampling criteria and on its quantitative analysis; we refer to esma’s press release and statement from 02/02/2016. better finance’s quantitative study therefore bears the same limitations as the esma one. funds by category fund filter guidelines to help you navigate through the findings of our replication of the esma study on closet indexing and to help you verify the status of your investment, better finance provides guidelines to help interpret the information available. fund filter guidelines all funds this is the full list of all sampled funds without categorisation. all funds funds with no reported benchmark list of the 6% of funds that do not report any benchmark in their prospectuses according to morningstar, making it impossible to provide the metrics used by esma to identify potentially falsely active funds. no benchmark funds with insufficient data list of the 50% of funds that do report a benchmark but apparently do not provide enough information for morningstar to compute the metrics selected by esma for those funds. insufficient data potentially active funds list of the 36% of funds that are sufficiently transparent (with regard to esma metrics in the morningstar database) and that – based on those metrics – do seem to be truly active. potentially active funds potential closet index funds list of the 7% of funds (and up to 16 % of the sufficiently transparent funds) that show characteristics that flag them as being potential closet index funds according to esma. potential closet tracker media coverage a selection of clippings from media covering the closet indexing study asset managers named in list of potential closet trackers it’s time to drag closet trackers into the light active managers named and shamed as 'closet indexers' ces fonds actifs qui répliquent les indices fondsliste alarmiert assetmanager trop de fonds faussement actifs commercialisés en europe más de 160 fondos se camuflan para elevar sus costes list of potential index huggers revealed about the study background, methodology and findings replicating the esma study on closet indexing background for years now the active management of investment funds has suffered negative criticism. following years of persistent failure by the majority of fund managers to outperform capital markets, the evidence in favour of index investing - also known as “passive management” - is building up. indeed, actual results tend to demonstrate that with high fees, scarce talent and intense competition, it is almost impossible for active managers as a whole to outperform the market in the long-term. since there’s a lot more money to be made from active management than from indexing, advisors and managers continued to spin the truth for years. but in the face of increasing evidence highlighting the disappointing performance of active management, fund managers sometimes turn to other tactics to justify the high fees. some turned to indexing and several financial institutions have steadily reduced fees by offering and promoting exchange-traded funds (etfs) that track indices, offering a better deal in the long-term than most "active" funds. other managers have started resorting to practices such as “index hugging”… this allows them to limit the risk of underperformance by clinging to an index but without advertising the fact that, for all intents and purposes, they are charging “active management” fees for what is essentially passive management. the practice of “closet indexing” is very misleading and the promotion and distribution of such funds causes substantial detriment because the investor is paying for a service that he or she is not receiving. better finance repeatedly denounced this practice and in october 2014 lodged a request with the european securities and markets authority (esma) for “closet indexing” to be investigated on a pan-european basis. nearly a year and a half later, on february 2nd 2016, esma published a statement providing details of its work on potentially falsely active funds and released some of the long-awaited results of its investigation. these results confirmed that investor detriment is possibly very serious since esma found that up to 188 funds - i.e. 15 % of the ucits funds it analysed - could potentially be falsely active based on quantitative measures available, a number that could have been much higher had esma included all ucits equity funds and all other equity funds that are widely sold to retail investors such as alternative investment funds (aifs). however, esma never disclosed the funds that were uncovered by its investigation as potentially falsely active, nor did it disclose in which countries they are domiciled, leaving eu investors in the dark. this is why better finance decided to replicate the esma study as closely as possible and - based on the same quantitative analysis performed by esma - to disclose the list of the ucits equity funds, including those that are potentially “closet indexers” according to the esma methodology, but also those that esma excluded from its analysis. disclaimer :the study carried out by better finance is only replicating the european regulator's (esma) 2015 study, using the same sources and referencing the same period: from 2010 to 2014 only. it is a one shot study limited in time. data results generated from esma's methodology and filtering criteria therefore may very well have changed since then. this website and study does not contain a complete list of equity funds sold in the eu but only the "ucits" equity funds selected following esma's criteria. better finance has not identified any closet index fund. it has only recreated and published the list of funds that esma sampled earlier, including those esma identified itself as “potential equity closet indexing funds”, based on its sampling criteria and on its quantitative analysis; we refer to esma’s press release and statement from 02/02/2016. better finance’s quantitative study therefore bears the same limitations as the esma one. for more information +00 32 (0)2 5143777 76 rue du lombard, 1000 brussels, belgium [email protected] . www.betterfinance.eu findings better finance found that 57% of the 2332 ucits funds it was able to investigate using the esma sampling criteria escape scrutiny because of a lack of available information. of those it was able to investigate, 16 % (165 funds in total) displayed characteristics that flag them as potential closet index funds based on the esma metrics. read the full press release here . methodology in order to replicate the esma study as closely as possible, better finance also used the morningstar database and filtered the full universe of funds using the same criteria as esma, both explicit and implicit. in order to faithfully present the findings of the study, the same criteria and time period were used as those by esma. better financ

URL analysis for checkyourfund.eu

https://checkyourfund.eu/#how
https://checkyourfund.eu/#how2
https://checkyourfund.eu/#guidelines
https://checkyourfund.eu/#categories
https://checkyourfund.eu/#checklist
https://checkyourfund.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/press-release-and-annexes-23-better-finance-replication-of-esma-study-on-closet-indexing.pdf
https://checkyourfund.eu/#activefunds
https://checkyourfund.eu/#terms
https://checkyourfund.eu/#nobenchmark
https://checkyourfund.eu/#db
https://checkyourfund.eu/#media
https://checkyourfund.eu/#inquiries
https://checkyourfund.eu/#nodata
https://checkyourfund.eu/#categories
https://checkyourfund.eu/#db

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

% The WHOIS service offered by EURid and the access to the records
% in the EURid WHOIS database are provided for information purposes
% only. It allows persons to check whether a specific domain name
% is still available or not and to obtain information related to
% the registration records of existing domain names.
%
% EURid cannot, under any circumstances, be held liable in case the
% stored information would prove to be wrong, incomplete or not
% accurate in any sense.
%
% By submitting a query you agree not to use the information made
% available to:
%
% - allow, enable or otherwise support the transmission of unsolicited,
% commercial advertising or other solicitations whether via email or
% otherwise;
% - target advertising in any possible way;
%
% - to cause nuisance in any possible way to the registrants by sending
% (whether by automated, electronic processes capable of enabling
% high volumes or other possible means) messages to them.
%
% Without prejudice to the above, it is explicitly forbidden to extract,
% copy and/or use or re-utilise in any form and by any means
% (electronically or not) the whole or a quantitatively or qualitatively
% substantial part of the contents of the WHOIS database without prior
% and explicit permission by EURid, nor in any attempt hereof, to apply
% automated, electronic processes to EURid (or its systems).
%
% You agree that any reproduction and/or transmission of data for
% commercial purposes will always be considered as the extraction of a
% substantial part of the content of the WHOIS database.
%
% By submitting the query you agree to abide by this policy and accept
% that EURid can take measures to limit the use of its WHOIS services
% in order to protect the privacy of its registrants or the integrity
% of the database.
%
% The EURid WHOIS service on port 43 (textual whois) never
% discloses any information concerning the registrant.
% Registrant and onsite contact information can be obtained through use of the
% webbased whois service available from the EURid website www.eurid.eu
%
% WHOIS checkyourfund.eu
Domain: checkyourfund.eu

Registrant:
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

Onsite(s):
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

Registrar:
Name: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Website: http://www.godaddy.com

Name servers:
ns70.domaincontrol.com
ns69.domaincontrol.com

Please visit www.eurid.eu for more info.

  REFERRER http://www.eurid.eu

  REGISTRAR EURID

SERVERS

  SERVER eu.whois-servers.net

  ARGS checkyourfund.eu

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME checkyourfund.eu

REGISTRAR

  NAME GoDaddy.com, LLC

  URL http://www.godaddy.com

NSERVER

  NS70.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 173.201.72.45

  NS69.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 216.69.185.45

OWNER
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.
Onsite(s):
NOT DISCLOSED!
Visit www.eurid.eu for webbased whois.

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .